top of page

TikTok’s Free Speech Hypocrisy and the Trillion-Dollar Double Standard: Why Should the U.S. Fund China’s Growth?

TikTok’s claim that banning the app infringes on free speech is a textbook example of irony so rich it could be served with a fortune cookie that reads, “Rules for thee, but not for me.” For a Chinese company to champion “free speech” in the United States is akin to someone crashing your party, lecturing you on etiquette, and then raiding your fridge. This argument doesn’t just strain credibility—it shatters it—and highlights the broader economic and political implications of allowing a Chinese-owned app to dominate the U.S. marketplace while shielding itself with principles its own country refuses to uphold.


The hypocrisy is glaring. A company originating from a nation where speech is tightly monitored and censored is now draping itself in the banner of the First Amendment—a right its home government systematically suppresses. This free speech posturing is not only disingenuous but appears to be a calculated ploy to exploit the open and democratic principles of the U.S. for corporate gain. And yet, the free speech defense seems to be wearing thin, with even the Supreme Court increasingly unwilling to entertain such hollow arguments when they come wrapped in the guise of constitutional righteousness.


Let’s not lose sight of what’s really at stake here. TikTok’s “free speech” claims are a smokescreen to distract from the fact that its dominance in the U.S. tech ecosystem generates enormous enterprise value—potentially in the trillions—for a Chinese economy that actively blocks reciprocal opportunities for U.S. entrepreneurs. The U.S. marketplace should not be the unwitting enabler of a system that refuses to play by the same rules. It’s time to confront this hypocrisy head-on and question why a company from a nation that suppresses speech and stifles competition should be allowed to thrive under the very freedoms it denies others.


The Double Standard in App Market Access


The Chinese government doesn’t just have a closed-door policy on foreign apps; they’ve practically bricked up the entrance. U.S. entrepreneurs hoping to break into the Chinese market with innovative apps or social media platforms are met with insurmountable hurdles, ranging from outright bans to draconian censorship rules. Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Google are all persona non grata in China, locked out because they don’t bow to the strict surveillance and control demanded by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Even LinkedIn, which played nice with Chinese regulators, ultimately withdrew because the level of censorship required was incompatible with its mission.


Meanwhile, Chinese apps like TikTok are allowed to roam free in the U.S., benefiting from an open market and building massive audiences. This isn’t just unfair—it’s a blatant economic and ideological double standard. Why should U.S. entrepreneurs play by the rules of free competition while Chinese companies are shielded by their government’s protectionism? The result is an unbalanced playing field where Chinese companies like ByteDance reap all the rewards of global expansion without reciprocating any of the risks or responsibilities.


The $1 Trillion Question


TikTok isn’t just a fun app where teenagers share dance routines and cooking hacks—it’s a juggernaut that has already created billions in enterprise value for ByteDance, its Chinese parent company. And by some estimates, TikTok is part of a broader Chinese tech ecosystem that could generate over $1 trillion in enterprise value globally. Let that sink in for a moment: the U.S. marketplace, its consumers, and its infrastructure are effectively underwriting the explosive growth of a Chinese tech empire.


Why should U.S. taxpayers, entrepreneurs, and businesses bear the burden of enriching the Chinese government—because, make no mistake, Chinese companies like ByteDance are deeply intertwined with the CCP. Under Chinese law, businesses are required to cooperate with the government, which means any data TikTok collects could theoretically be accessed by the CCP. The U.S. is essentially creating a pipeline of wealth and data that flows directly into China’s coffers while receiving nothing close to comparable opportunities in return.


The Missed Opportunities for U.S. Entrepreneurs


Every dollar spent on TikTok is a dollar not spent on a U.S.-owned platform. While TikTok dominates the social media landscape, American entrepreneurs struggle to gain the same traction in China. Imagine the innovations and opportunities that could arise if U.S. developers had unrestricted access to a market as vast as China’s. Instead, they’re locked out, while Chinese companies like ByteDance freely exploit the open U.S. market.


This imbalance doesn’t just hurt U.S. entrepreneurs—it stifles innovation. By allowing TikTok to dominate without reciprocity, the U.S. is effectively sidelining its own talent and funding the rise of a competitor that operates under an entirely different set of rules. It’s like inviting someone to play basketball on your court, only to find out they’re allowed to double-dribble, travel, and hang on the rim while you’re stuck playing by the rulebook.


Economic Patriotism vs. Global Hypocrisy


There’s a broader question at play here: Why should the U.S. be responsible for creating wealth for a foreign government that actively works to undermine the principles of free markets and free speech? China’s tech giants are not purely private enterprises; they operate in a tightly controlled environment where the government wields significant influence. When you download TikTok, you’re not just supporting a fun app—you’re supporting a system that actively works against the very freedoms that TikTok claims to champion in its U.S. defense.


If the U.S. were to impose a ban or even stricter regulations on TikTok, it wouldn’t be a violation of free speech—it would be an act of economic self-preservation. By leveling the playing field, the U.S. would send a clear message: If Chinese companies want access to our markets, they need to offer the same opportunities to U.S. businesses in theirs. Reciprocity isn’t just fair—it’s essential for maintaining a balanced and sustainable global economy.


TikTok Is Replaceable


Finally, let’s dispense with the notion that TikTok is some irreplaceable cultural cornerstone. The reality is that TikTok is a platform—a very successful one, but a platform nonetheless. Platforms come and go. Remember Vine? MySpace? AIM? American companies like YouTube, Instagram, and Snapchat already offer alternatives, and if TikTok were to disappear tomorrow, U.S. developers would undoubtedly step in to fill the void. The American tech ecosystem thrives on innovation, and there’s no shortage of talent ready to create the next big thing—if given the opportunity to compete on fair terms.


Level the Playing Field


The U.S. is not obligated to fund China’s trillion-dollar tech empire, nor is it required to allow Chinese companies like TikTok to dominate its market while U.S. entrepreneurs are locked out of China’s. Free speech isn’t the issue here—fairness is. If TikTok wants to operate in the U.S., it’s time for China to open its markets to American companies. Until then, banning or restricting TikTok isn’t an attack on free speech; it’s a necessary step toward protecting U.S. economic interests, promoting innovation, and ensuring that the rules of global competition apply to everyone equally. If TikTok can’t handle that, perhaps it’s time to swipe left.


Comments


bottom of page